User Groups: Difference between revisions
Jim McGowan (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Jim McGowan (talk | contribs) (Updated User Groups per Kristen Molyneaux.) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
! Torque Admin | ! Torque Admin | ||
! LfC Staff | ! LfC Staff | ||
! | ! Decision Makers - Select* | ||
! | ! Decision Makers - Full | ||
! | ! Interested Donors | ||
! | ! Research Partners | ||
! Torque Basic | ! Torque Basic | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align: right;" | | | style="text-align: right;" | Description: | ||
| style="text-align: center;" | | | style="text-align: center;" | Application Administrators | ||
| style="text-align: center;" | | | style="text-align: center;" | Lever for Change Staff and Data Fellows | ||
| style="text-align: center;" | Board Members, Donors | | style="text-align: center;" | Board Members, Donors and Selection Committee Members (View is limited to a specific subset of proposals) | ||
| style="text-align: center;" | | | style="text-align: center;" | Relevant Donor Advisors, Selection Support Team, Contracted TA Advisors and Decision Makers that require access to all proposals | ||
| style="text-align: center;" | | | style="text-align: center;" | Any interested Third Party Donor (with an NDA) who wants to explore proposal options but is not part of a competition or selection team | ||
| style="text-align: center;" | | | style="text-align: center;" | Any interested Third Party (Academic Institution, Infomediary, etc.) partnering with Lever for the Change for the purpose of data sharing and research | ||
| style="text-align: center;" | All others | | style="text-align: center;" | All others including MacArthur Foundation Staff and Partners without an NDA | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Application visibility | |Application visibility | ||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
| style="text-align: center;" |'''√''' | | style="text-align: center;" |'''√''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Access peer-to-peer review | | Access peer-to-peer review comments/scores | ||
| style="text-align: center;" |'''√''' | | style="text-align: center;" |'''√''' | ||
| style="text-align: center;" |'''√''' | | style="text-align: center;" |'''√''' | ||
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Access | | Access judge review comments/scores | ||
| style="text-align: center;" |'''√''' | | style="text-align: center;" |'''√''' | ||
| style="text-align: center;" |'''√''' | | style="text-align: center;" |'''√''' | ||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Access analysis | | Access Stage 1 application analysis | ||
| style="text-align: center;" |'''√''' | | style="text-align: center;" |'''√''' | ||
| style="text-align: center;" |'''√''' | | style="text-align: center;" |'''√''' | ||
Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
| style="text-align: center;" |'''√''' | | style="text-align: center;" |'''√''' | ||
| style="text-align: center;" | | | style="text-align: center;" | | ||
| style="text-align: center;" | | | style="text-align: center;" | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 92: | Line 92: | ||
| style="text-align: center;" |'''√''' | | style="text-align: center;" |'''√''' | ||
| style="text-align: center;" | | | style="text-align: center;" | | ||
| style="text-align: center;" | | | style="text-align: center;" |Shared on a case-by-case basis with AD/VP approval | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 135: | Line 135: | ||
| style="text-align: center;" |'''√''' | | style="text-align: center;" |'''√''' | ||
| style="text-align: center;" |'''√''' | | style="text-align: center;" |'''√''' | ||
| | |'''√''' | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 144: | Line 144: | ||
| style="text-align: center;" |'''√''' | | style="text-align: center;" |'''√''' | ||
| style="text-align: center;" |'''√''' | | style="text-align: center;" |'''√''' | ||
| | |'''√''' | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 161: | Line 161: | ||
| style="text-align: center;" |'''√''' | | style="text-align: center;" |'''√''' | ||
| style="text-align: center;" |'''√''' | | style="text-align: center;" |'''√''' | ||
| | |'''√''' | ||
| | |'''√''' | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 221: | Line 221: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| colspan="8" |* | | colspan="8" |* Decision Makers - Select are typically limited to viewing a subset of proposals - like ''Finalist Candidates'' - for the purpose of award selection. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| colspan="8" | ** Includes: Anonymized Peer-to-Peer and Judge Comments and Scores (Evaluations page) | | colspan="8" | ** Includes: Anonymized Peer-to-Peer and Judge Comments and Scores (Evaluations page) | ||
Line 227: | Line 227: | ||
| colspan="8" | *** Includes: Applicant Ranking | | colspan="8" | *** Includes: Applicant Ranking | ||
|- | |- | ||
| colspan="8" |<sup>†</sup> Includes: Project Governance, Legal Compliance, Organization Financials, Donor References, Financial Review, Virtual Q&A Recording and Notes, In- | | colspan="8" |<sup>†</sup> Includes: Project Governance, Legal Compliance, Organization Financials, Donor References, Financial/Legal Review, Virtual Q&A Recording and Notes, In-Person Site Visit Notes, LFC Analysis (Stage 1 and Stage 2), Audited Financials and 990s. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| colspan="8" |<sup>††</sup> Includes: Narrative, Finalist Q&A Responses, Project Budget, Strategy Documents, Evaluation & Learning, Stakeholder Engagement, Bibliography, (Anonymized) Tech Review, DEI and Accessibility. | | colspan="8" |<sup>††</sup> Includes: Narrative, Finalist Q&A Responses, Project Budget, Strategy Documents, Evaluation & Learning, Stakeholder Engagement, Bibliography, (Anonymized) Tech Review, DEI and Accessibility. | ||
|} | |} |
Revision as of 16:09, 12 June 2022
DRAFT
There are now only seven (six?) Torque User Groups. The matrix below lists which permissions are assigned to which User Groups.
Questions about User Groups and their associated permissions can be directed to Jeff Ubois (jubois@leverforchange.macfound.org) or Jim McGowan (jimmmcgowan@hey.com).
User Groups: | Torque Admin | LfC Staff | Decision Makers - Select* | Decision Makers - Full | Interested Donors | Research Partners | Torque Basic |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: | Application Administrators | Lever for Change Staff and Data Fellows | Board Members, Donors and Selection Committee Members (View is limited to a specific subset of proposals) | Relevant Donor Advisors, Selection Support Team, Contracted TA Advisors and Decision Makers that require access to all proposals | Any interested Third Party Donor (with an NDA) who wants to explore proposal options but is not part of a competition or selection team | Any interested Third Party (Academic Institution, Infomediary, etc.) partnering with Lever for the Change for the purpose of data sharing and research | All others including MacArthur Foundation Staff and Partners without an NDA |
Application visibility | All | All | Limited | All | All | All | All |
Access application data | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
Access peer-to-peer review comments/scores | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Access judge review comments/scores | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Access Stage 1 application analysis | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
Access aggregated scores** | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Access aggregated rankings*** | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
Access confidential attachments† | √ | √ | √ | √ | Shared on a case-by-case basis with AD/VP approval | ||
Access non-confidential attachments†† | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||
Edit proposal data | √ | √ | |||||
Admin Torque (edit TorqueConfig pages) | √ | ||||||
Read team comments | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
Write team comments | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
See team comment usernames | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
See PickSome picks | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
Add PickSome picks | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
Admin PickSome picks | √ | ||||||
Edit/create wiki pages | √ | √ | |||||
View logs | √ | √ | |||||
Admin MediaWiki (add users, remove users, etc) | √ | ||||||
Unrestricted MediaWiki UI | √ | √ | |||||
Emulate user groups | √ | √ | |||||
* Decision Makers - Select are typically limited to viewing a subset of proposals - like Finalist Candidates - for the purpose of award selection. | |||||||
** Includes: Anonymized Peer-to-Peer and Judge Comments and Scores (Evaluations page) | |||||||
*** Includes: Applicant Ranking | |||||||
† Includes: Project Governance, Legal Compliance, Organization Financials, Donor References, Financial/Legal Review, Virtual Q&A Recording and Notes, In-Person Site Visit Notes, LFC Analysis (Stage 1 and Stage 2), Audited Financials and 990s. | |||||||
†† Includes: Narrative, Finalist Q&A Responses, Project Budget, Strategy Documents, Evaluation & Learning, Stakeholder Engagement, Bibliography, (Anonymized) Tech Review, DEI and Accessibility. |